Stupid

The capacity of a 17-year-old’s working memory who had spent their whole lives in poverty could hold an average of 8.5 items in their memory at any time.

.

Those brought up in a middle-class family could manage 9.4, and those whose economic and social experiences had been mixed were in the middle.
.

These two correlations do not by themselves prove that chronic stress damages the memory, but Dr Evans and Dr Schamberg then applied a statistical technique called hierarchical regression to the results.

.

They were able to use this to remove the effect of allostatic load on the relationship between poverty and memory discovered originally by Dr Farah.

.

When they did so, that relationship disappeared. In other words, the diminution of memory in the poorer members of their study was entirely explained by stress, rather than by any more general aspect of poverty.

.

To confirm this result, the researchers also looked at characteristics such as each participant’s birthweight, his mother’s age when she gave birth, the mother’s level of education and her marital status, all of which differ, on average, between the poor and the middle classes.

.

None of these characteristics had any effect.

.

Nor did a mother’s own stress levels.

.

That stress, and stress alone, is responsible for damaging the working memories of poor children thus looks like a strong hypothesis.

.

It is also backed up by work done on both people and laboratory animals, which shows that stress changes the activity of neurotransmitters, the chemicals that carry signals from one nerve cell to another in the brain.

.

Stress also suppresses the generation of new nerve cells in the brain, and causes the “remodelling” of existing ones.

.

Most significantly of all, it shrinks the volume of the prefrontal cortex and the hippocampus.

.

These are the parts of the brain most closely associated with working memory.

.

Children with stressed lives, then, find it harder to learn.

.

Put pejoratively, they are stupider. It is not surprising that they do less well at school, end up poor as adults and often visit the same circumstances on their own children.
.

Dr Evans’s and Dr Schamberg’s study does not examine the nature of the stress that the children of the poor are exposed to, but it is now well established that poor adults live stressful lives, and not just for the obvious reason that poverty brings uncertainty about the future.

.

The main reason poor people are stressed is that they are at the bottom of the social heap as well as the financial one.

.

Sir Michael Marmot, of University College London, and his intellectual successors have shown repeatedly that people at the bottom of social hierarchies experience much more stress in their daily lives than those at the top—and suffer the consequences in their health.

.

Even quite young children are socially sensitive beings and aware of such things.

.

So, it may not be necessary to look any further than their place in the pecking order to explain what Dr Evans and Dr Schamberg have discovered in their research into the children of the poor.

.

The Bible says, “the poor you will always have with you.” Dr Evans and Dr Schamberg may have provided an important part of the explanation why.

Economist

.

The article certainly explains some of the mechanics but not the true causes

.

Karma and reincarnation might be a better explanation

.

And this will continue for many many years to come

.

Until we reach that far distant day when we have moved away from selfishness and greed

.

And thence the need for people paying their karma for greed and selfishness in previous lives

.

At that time and that time only will there be no more poor people