Prohibition = Hypocrisy = Politics = Vested interests
Certainly we can all understand how many interest groups derive money from the continuance of prohibition on different substances
Certainly we can see the damage inflicted, the waste of lives
More difficult to ignore is the proof that prohibition does more harm than good
The clear and continuing message that humans will always do those things that bring them personal pleasure
With or without prohibition
Certainly we can see the political advantage of prohibition
What is more difficult to see is why journalists cannot rouse themselves to fight once in a while
Certainly we see that the media is controlled by those who are in league with politicians
But with the screamingly obvious like prohibition
Can they not rouse themselves?
They even have children
What will they tell them?
They were too busy to get involved?
Too frightened?
Too lazy?
Whatever the truth
Prohibition raises again the question as to what rights do governments have to interfere in the choices their citizens make with regard to what they consume?
On the one hand governments feel it is fine to force increasing numbers of inoculations on children and society at large
On the other they say you may not take or consume this or that substance
So they want it both ways
You may not consume this
But you must consume or take that
Out of control
The nanny state has overstepped what is reasonable
Prohibition is not a solution to any problem
Time to fight both prohibition and enforced vaccination programs
No comments:
Post a Comment