Carl Court/AFP/Getty Images
The man above, Emdadur Choudhury was fined £50 for burning a poppy.
.
But defacing the American flag is deemed acceptable.
.
Section five of the Public Order Act in the UK has a corrosive effect on free speech – it's time to roll back the culture of being offended.
.
Sometimes you have to feel sorry for the police.
.
Beyond already dealing with a raft of ill-considered laws, politicians also want them to act against "insulting" behaviour.
.
Section five of the Public Order Act is so broad that almost any protester on any subject can be arrested and fined for harassment, causing "alarm or distress".
.
It's not merely theoretical; many ludicrous cases have been prosecuted.
.
The police arrested a student who held up a sign stating Scientology was a cult – surely a matter of opinion?
.
Kyle Little, a 16-year-old from Newcastle, was fined £50 with £150 costs for saying "woof" to a labrador dog in front of police officers.
.
Eventually the magistrates' decision was overturned by a crown court.
.
The very arbitrary nature of deciding what is insulting gives the police a power they can misuse.
.
After a night out with friends, Sam Brown asked a police officer:
.
"Excuse me, do you realise your horse is gay?" Police took Brown to court after he refused to pay an £80 fine.
.
The CPS eventually dropped the case.
.
Criminalising "insult" has a detrimental effect on freedom of expression.
.
The term is so broad that it creates legal inconsistencies.
.
There is legal authority that defacing the American flag is a non-insulting form of protest but burning a poppy is criminally insulting.
.
It makes little sense.
.
These powers are widely used during protests.
.
Protest is often directed at an unsympathetic audience and will often directly cause offence.
.
Oil companies may feel insulted by accusations of having blood on their hands, but there is a clear public interest in having opinions on the behaviour of the powerful heard.
.
Lord Justice Sedley said in Redmond-Bate v DPP "Free speech includes not only the inoffensive but the irritating, the contentious, the eccentric, the heretical, the unwelcome and the provocative provided it does not tend to provoke violence.
.
Freedom only to speak inoffensively is not worth having.
.
Yet, the inclusion of "insulting" in the Public Order Act means there is no clear jurisprudence between the offensive speech protected by Sedley and insult as criminalised by the act.
.
Unfortunately most of these cases will go nowhere near learned judges, and the majority of these fines won't be challenged by a public that has never been informed of its rights.
.
Very few of these cases get beyond a magistrates court, and divisional courts, where some of these fines have been quashed, are often loth to intervene.
.
When asked to determine the meaning of the word insulting under the previous form of the act, the House of Lords held in Brutus v Cozens that "parliament has given no indication that the word is to be given any unusual meaning.
.
Insulting means insulting and nothing else.
.
This law, combined with our culture of offence, means there is the expectation that opinions deemed offensive should be criminalised.
.
Our tolerance of the harmless eccentric has waned.
.
The British no longer raise an eyebrow at fringe opinions, but demand the full force of the law.
.
One example is Harry Hammond, a 69-year-old evangelist street preacher.
.
Hammond believed homosexuality was a sin and wanted everyone to know this.
.
So he stood in the streets of Brighton proselytising against homosexuality with a sign proclaiming the catchy slogan: "Jesus Gives Peace, Jesus is Alive, Stop Immorality, Stop Homosexuality, Stop Lesbianism, Jesus is Lord."
.
Instead of ignoring an old bigoted man, a crowd gathered.
.
At one point he fell to the ground in a tussle over his placard, and soil and water were thrown over him.
.
While Hammond was charged under section five, no one in the crowd was charged for assaulting him.
.
He was fined £300 by a magistrate and ordered to pay costs of £395.
.
The court also ordered the forfeiture of his sign.
.
He died shortly after his conviction.
.
Gay rights activist Peter Tatchell described Hammond's prosecution as "an outrageous assault on civil liberties".
.
While it's easy to see how Hammond's behaviour could rile a crowd, the danger with policing offence is that it's highly subjective.
.
Perhaps only a generation ago, when there was very little tolerance towards homosexuality, a gay pride march could have been prosecuted for insulting Christians like Hammond.
.
Luckily, liberty has friends in parliament.
.
Conservative MP Dominic Raab discovered that section five was used 18,249 times in 2009.
.
Less than one in six of these offences had a religious or racial element, the majority were for the non-specified crime of insult.
.
Following pressure from the Liberal Democrats, the Home Office consulted on this issue.
.
My organisation, Index on Censorship, has been lobbying hard for ministers to roll back the culture of offence which has a corrosive effect on free speech.
.
Removing insult from section five would be a good start.
.
Finding the correct balance between public order and legitimate protest isn't always easy.
.
But asking the police to patrol offence has undermined public trust in them.
.
Rightly so, for it is not the job of local bobbies or magistrates to protect citizens from insult.
.
Christian preachers or mouthy anarchists may irritate, but in an open, free society, robust opinion will insult you: perhaps we all just need to get used to it.
.
Mike Harris - Guardian
No comments:
Post a Comment