In America Democrats pay lip service to the need to slim the rulebook
.
Mr Obama’s regulations tsar is supposed to ensure that new rules are cost-effective.
.
But the administration has a bias towards overstating benefits and underestimating costs.
.
Republicans bluster that they will repeal Obama care and Dodd-Frank and abolish whole government agencies, but give only a sketchy idea of what should replace them.
.
America needs a smarter approach to regulation.
.
First, all important rules should be subjected to cost-benefit analysis by an independent watchdog.
.
The results should be made public before the rule is enacted.
.
All big regulations should also come with sunset clauses.
.
So that they expire after, say, ten years unless Congress explicitly re-authorises them.
.
More important, rules need to be much simpler.
.
When regulators try to write an all-purpose instruction manual, the truly important dos and don’ts are lost in an ocean of verbiage.
.
Far better to lay down broad goals and prescribe only what is strictly necessary to achieve them.
.
Legislators should pass simple rules, and leave regulators to enforce them.
.
Would this hand too much power to unelected bureaucrats?
.
Not if they are made more accountable.
.
Unreasonable judgements should be subject to swift appeal.
.
Regulators who make bad decisions should be easily sackable.
.
None of this will resolve the inevitable difficulties of regulating a complex modern society.
.
But it would mitigate a real danger
.
That regulation may crush the life out of America’s economy.
.
And why the Amen?
.
Because everywhere the nonsense of regulations for everything are galloping out of control..
Similar constraints are needed everywhere, not just in America.
No comments:
Post a Comment