Monday, March 23, 2009

Moral issue



Professor Bill Ledger, professor of obstetrics and gynaecology at Sheffield University and a member of the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority, said it was legitimate for a young woman with cancer to have her eggs frozen before chemotherapy seriously damaged her childbearing potential, but it was ethically questionable for women to do it purely for what he called "lifestyle reasons".

We should be very careful about performing medical procedures on healthy people.

The group I worry about are women who are healthy and want to have kids, but do it later.

The image that's portrayed [of egg freezing] is that a woman in her late 20s or early 30s can establish a relationship 10 or 15 years later and then take the eggs out of the freezer, fertilise them with the partner's sperm and have the baby.

That's the dream.

The central issue is that it doesn't work very well.

The chance of a baby from a frozen egg with vitrification is less than 6% per egg.

By doing the egg freezing for social reasons, they are taking a huge gamble for their future.

Concern that babies born using egg freezing may not be healthy should also dissuade women from undertaking the procedure, which costs about £5,000, added Ledger.

Melanie Davies, a professor of reproductive medicine at University College Hospital in London, endorsed Ledger's comments.

They [women] may have a perception that it's a panacea and will guarantee them the opportunity to have a family in later years - that it's some sort of miracle technique.

But it's still early days to be reliant on this technique and at the moment it should not be used for women who want to guarantee a family in the future.

The message has to be that your best chance of having a baby is doing it naturally when you are under 35."

She criticised the recent introduction of an egg-freezing scheme that enables women under 35 to donate some of their eggs for implantation into a recipient in return for the fertility clinic agreeing to store their remaining eggs for free.

Such schemes could lead to the "emotional trauma" of a child born to the recipient tracing its natural donor mother when it turns 18, as the law allows.

Ledger and Davies were speaking in a personal capacity.

Forty-one clinics are licensed to offer egg freezing in the UK

HFEA figures show that 78 women froze their eggs for non-medical reasons in 2007, more than double the 33 who did so the year before, and that their average age was 37.

The Guardian

Truly this is also a moral issue

How do you feel about this?

2 comments:

Alexandra said...

Strange how humans make life material and controlled. Where is the Wonder in this, the heart, love...well all that is alive and free? And for me, to say the least, where is the fun, the adventure, the awe of being here! Where is the Wholeness, Selflessness and Learning! Having love, having a smile...no money can buy us that.

Anonymous said...

http://surrogacy101.blogspot.com/2009/02/preserving-fertility-egg-freezing-just.html

I wrote this blog entry on Feb, 12th and I think that it's along the same lines:

Thursday, February 12, 2009
Preserving Fertility: Egg Freezing 'Just In Case'

So I have a question....perhaps it will turn into several questions but that's how it goes with me.

I am wondering about this trend to have young women, albeit those who have the financial wherewithal, freeze their eggs way before they are even thinking of becoming mothers. I am all for getting the word out there to the girls and young women regarding the biological clock and educating everyone on what can affect fertility in general, however, I am uncertain of the push to freeze eggs for 'just in case'.

Just in case.....
You don't find Mr. Perfect before your clock stops ticking
Just in case.....
You catch a STD that makes you infertile
Just in case.....
You find out later in life you are infertile or have cancer or have a medical condition that effects your egg production

I am sure that there is a longer list but for those young women who are healthy now, will fear of their fertile future drive them into undergoing an egg retrieval and the yearly cost of keeping their precious DNA frozen? And after they become pregnant on their own will they have the emotional dilemma regarding their now 5 or 10 year old frozen eggs? Will those eggs be destroyed? Will these women now be asked to donate them? What about the woman who doesn't get pregnant on her own and wants to use her eggs....will she be able to even afford the IVF procedure? The medications? What will that option be like over the next decade? AND what happens when the frozen eggs don't result in a pregnancy? What then?

I told you that I may have more then one question.

I have a 13 year old daughter. She knows all about Egg Donation, Surrogacy, and IVF (At least as much as she may want to know) I have given her every vaccination, protected her from exposure of toxic materials (No smoking in OUR house, please!) and generally have given her the tools to keep herself safe. I am drawing the line at freezing her eggs. Because she is a healthy young teen, I see no need of it. If she is unfortunate and is found to have cancer or some other life threatening disease then I may encourage her to freeze her eggs at that time. But for young, healthy women, I think education and fertility awareness is a must. The rest? I am not so sure about.

Sharon LaMothe
www.InfertilityAnswers.net