Thursday, February 11, 2010

Climate Science



.
That is extremely easy to prove.
.
No one can state the theory.
.
Ask a climate scientist for his theory and all you will get, if anything, is a discussion of the properties of the CO2 molecule.
.
Climate scientists cannot tell us where in Earth's atmosphere CO2 concentrations are to be found.
.
In fact, in all their work, they assume that CO2 particles are distributed randomly throughout the atmosphere, including all the way up.
.
Shocking, is it not?
.
If climate scientists are serious about measuring CO2 concentrations in the atmosphere, they will create tens of thousands of measurement stations in Earth's atmosphere.
.
Does it matter where in the atmosphere CO2 concentrations are found?
.
Surely, it does.
.
Since CO2 molecules increase warmth by reflecting various kinds of rays that come from reflected sunlight, then molecules that are higher in the atmosphere will reflect proportionately fewer rays because most rays will be reflected to the side, not down.
.
Molecules 50 miles high will reflect hardly anything back to the surface.
.
Climate scientists do have one thing that strikes some people as theoretical, and that is computer simulation.
.
Yet everyone knows that their simulations are woefully inadequate as a model of Earth?s atmosphere and that, at this time in history, no useful scenarios can come from them.
.
Again, my evidence is rock solid.
.
No one will present a computer model to refute my claims because there is none.
.
Finally, the case of Jones, Mann, and CRU.
.
Their work involved no theory whatsoever.
.
They were looking in nature for proxy records of temperature change.
.
In that kind of endeavor, where you are simply counting tree rings, there is little work that can be called theory.
.
Of course, there are statistical calculations to be made, but Jones and crew refused to share their raw data and, consequently, their work could not be checked.
.
Even if the raw data had been shared there is ample evidence on the Internet that the number of measuring stations is woefully small on Earth's surface and essentially nonexistent in Earth's atmosphere.
.
Tens of thousands of measuring stations are needed.
.
More important, a high-tech method of collecting data from measuring stations is desperately needed.
.
In addition, there needs to be a uniform code for the siting of weather stations.
.
So, tell me, Sir, if you can, where are the interesting features of CO2 concentrations in the atmosphere?
.
Are there CO2 hot spots?
.
Are there rivers of CO2 flowing to and fro?
.
Please state the theory that explains these matters or concede that there is no theory that explains how global warming is caused by man made carbon dioxide.
.
Theo  Goodwin
There is no theory behind so-called climate science.

No comments: